join donate discuss

Which sites have been put forward for development near you?

Three Rivers District Council (TRDC) is consulting on a new Local Plan. You can view the consultation here.

Part 2: Sites for Potential Allocation

80% of the additional dwellings set out in the potential sites allocation document are allocated to sites previously in the Green Belt. There are many sites of serious concern including:

CFS10 - Land between Millhouse Lane and Bell Lane, Bedmond - Open grassland

CFS19 - Land adjacent 62-84 & 99-121 Sycamore Road - Amenity Grassland

CFS18b - Hill Farm, Stag Lane - Agricultural

EOS12.2 - Land to the west and south of Maple Cross - Agricultural

CFS69a - Land at Carpenders Park Farm - Agricultural

PCS47 - South of Little Oxhey Lane - Agricultural

OSPF22 - Batchworth Golf Course

Part 1: Preferred Policy Options

Housing numbers

Based on a national ‘standard methodology’ for calculating the District’s housing need, Three Rivers must provide 630 dwellings per year, resulting in an overall target of 12,624 dwellings over the plan period to 2038. However, TRDC has come up with its own figure of 10,678 dwellings (1,946 already committed and 8,973 additional homes). It's not entirely clear from the consultation documents what the Council's alternative methodology is for this new figure. CPRE Hertfordshire has already published an initial assessment stating TRDC is accounting for an overprovision of housing due to the projections being out of date. The latest projections show a decrease in new households and therefore a reduced number of houses which should be planned for. The Council has failed to take account of local planning authorities' ability to challenge the Government's calculation for housing numbers and to restrict the scale of development due to planning constraints of an individual area.

Residents’ Associations across the district believe the Local Plan contains significantly too much housing resulting in unnecessary damage to our environment and, in particular, Green Belt.

Please sign and share the petition calling to reduce the housing target.

Affordable housing

The need for affordable housing is equivalent to 60% of the District’s total housing requirement (see 4.48 of Part 1). However, the preferred policy option states all new development with a net gain of one or more dwellings will be expected to provide only 40% for affordable rent. Developments delivering 10 or more dwellings should provide an additional 10% for affordable home ownership.

It is also stated that where developers justify a lower amount of affordable housing (which happens too often) the Council will seek to secure the preferred tenure split (i.e. rented accommodation over home ownership) as a priority over a higher percentage of affordable housing overall.

The affordable housing target should at least meet the identified need and be backed up by strong policies. Considering the extreme unaffordability of housing in Three Rivers and the poor delivery rate of affordable housing on recent developments, the Local Plan should be utilised to its fullest potential to hold developers to their obligations. Unfortunately, the current policies feel watered down and come across as pandering to developers.

Biodiversity

The policy options refer to biodiversity as an asset but mainly as a setting for development and opportunities for recreation and leisure. It includes the policy statement: "Development should result in a net gain of biodiversity value." However, no specific targets are set. Furthermore, no details are given for how a biodiversity net gain should be measured. The Plan requires clear targets and deliverables otherwise it is useless.

Climate change

TRDC declared a Climate Emergency in May 2019 and the Local Plan is the key mechanism for the Council to implement the requirements of this declaration. Although the objectives identify climate change issues in the most general terms, the policy options clearly prioritises housing provision and greenfield land development over such considerations. The proposed policies fail to take account of the need for carbon reduction targets and sustainable transport provision, amongst many other concerns, and a carbon reduction pathway is needed to meet national obligations for net zero emissions by 2050.

Your response

It's really important that local residents, who are familiar with the potential development sites, have their say to highlight if and how a site will have a detrimental impact on the community. Some sites have already been dropped prior to consultation as they were considered to cause "particular harm to existing communities and residents’ quality of life without providing compensating benefits to the community". This shows that pressure from local residents can have an impact on the choice of sites taken forward.

We also believe it is important to support sites that will have the least detrimental impact, that can deliver benefits to the wider community, and contribute to the overall vision of a sustainable and healthy district.

This is a draft version of The Plan which means that elements of it can still change before it is published. Alterations can be made based on the feedback received from this consultation or the findings of any emerging evidence.

We are seeking views from members and supporters in order to compile a comprehensive view of sites across the whole district. We encourage you to get in touch with your views. Please do respond to the consultation directly and encourage your neighbours to do so as well.

Update: the consultation period has been extended and now closes on 20th August 2021.

You can find a summary and our full response in the following news article

Support the “No-mow” motion

By emjbrading | 11th November 2021

On 24th November (7.30 pm) the Leisure, Environment and Community Committee at Three Rivers District Council will be considering the following “no-mow” motion: “to look for opportunities to cease mowing up to 50% of the grassland it owns and manages and replace this with hay meadow management (cutting and clearing twice a year). This will […]

Read More…

Are you eligible for the Green Homes Grant?

By emjbrading | 11th November 2021

The Green Homes Grant is a fund of more than £1million available to Three Rivers residents until March 2022. The scheme is administered by Three Rivers District Council. Find out more It is targeting households who would like a warmer home but cannot afford to make energy-saving home improvements, with fully funded measures worth up […]

Read More…

Our response to the Local Plan consultation

By emjbrading | 4th August 2021

Three Rivers District Council (TRDC) is consulting on a new Local Plan which will deliver 8,973 new homes. 80% are allocated to sites in the Green Belt. Please see our full response to Part 1: Preferred Policy Options here and to Part 2: Sites for Potential Allocation here. These are a collection of comments made […]

Read More…

Which sites have been put forward for development near you?

By emjbrading | 18th June 2021

Three Rivers District Council (TRDC) is consulting on a new Local Plan. You can view the consultation here. Part 2: Sites for Potential Allocation 80% of the additional dwellings set out in the potential sites allocation document are allocated to sites previously in the Green Belt. There are many sites of serious concern including: CFS10 […]

Read More…

Support Croxley Green Parish Council to stop the development of the Red Cross Centre

By emjbrading | 25th May 2021

Three Rivers District Council has designated the Red Cross Centre as a site for future development with 6 dwellings to be built on the land. This decision will remove a vital, well-used community space, which was built using funds raised directly from Croxley Green residents. Three Rivers District Council own the land where the Centre […]

Read More…

Chris celebrates a strong election result in Dickinsons Ward

By emjbrading | 13th May 2021

In the Three Rivers District Council elections in 2021 Chris Mitchell increased the vote for the Green Party in Dickinsons Ward, Croxley Green, eightfold from 119 to 961, and the vote share sixfold from 6% to over 38%.  He was narrowly beaten by the Liberal Democrats whose vote share fell by a third from 66% […]

Read More…

Greens fight for better housing at Killingdown Farm

By emjbrading | 3rd May 2021

Chris Mitchell, Green Party candidate for Dickinsons Ward, has succeeded in persuading the developers of Killingdown Farm in Croxley Green to improve energy saving in 160 proposed new homes. Installing heat pumps instead of mains gas connection will result in an energy saving of 43%, a vast improvement on current minimum building standards. Chris has […]

Read More…

SYCAMORE AMENITY LAND – Let’s give credit where credit is due

By emjbrading | 28th April 2021

It wasn’t ONLY the Liberal Democrat ward councillors who helped stop the recent application to build on the Sycamore Road amenity land (used by the residents of the flats), as comes across in the recent Lib Dem leaflet. My congratulations go to the many residents who objected so strongly (71 separate objections). In particular to […]

Read More…

We are prophets but we are also agents of change

By Andrew | 7th July 2020

By Mary Chabrel, Green Party member. Thirty years ago this month, I finished my GCSEs, Geography being one of them. I was already a conservation volunteer in the Colne Valley and in the lower sixth I founded ‘Help Earth Live Peacefully’, a still applicable maxim I think! The group collected cans in separate bins, squashed […]

Read More…

Green Party stands with Black Lives Matter every step of the way

By Andrew | 22nd June 2020

22nd June marks Windrush Day, a day which commemorates the Windrush Generation and their legacy. The first generation of workers came to the UK by invitation to help rebuild Britain after World War II but many were met with hostility and intolerance when they arrived. Since then, Black individuals have been wrongly detained, denied legal rights, […]

Read More…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

en_GBEnglish